Each drone strike creates at least 40 new militants – ex-State Dept. official

October 24, 2013

A former high-ranking official from the Department of State claims that the mass loss of civilian life caused by American-launched drone strikes in Yemen are creating dozens of new militants with each attack.

Nabeel Khoury, the deputy chief of mission in Yemen for the State  Department from 2004 to 2007, writes in the Cairo Review this  week that the use of unmanned aerial vehicles against alleged  Al-Qaeda operatives is breeding anti-American sentiment overseas.

The editorial, published Wednesday, comes as the  United States’ use of drones is dominating discussions in  Washington and around the world. Two leading human rights  organizations condemned drones in a pair of reports released earlier this week, and on  Wednesday the prime minister of Pakistan urged US President Barack Obama to cease drone  strikes in his country and essentially halt an operation that has  involved hundreds of attacks since 2004.

According to Khoury, similar attacks conducted in Yemen during  the last few years have spawned a hatred that could immensely  hurt America’s efforts.

Drone strikes take out a few bad guys to be sure, but they  also kill a large number of innocent civilians. Given Yemen’s  tribal structure, the US generates roughly forty to sixty new  enemies for every AQAP operative killed by drones,” Khoury  wrote, referring to Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

In war, unmanned aircraft may be a necessary part of a  comprehensive military strategy. In a country where we are not at  war, however, drones become part of our foreign policy,  dominating it altogether, to the detriment of both our security  and political goals,” he added.

Khoury is currently a senior fellow for Middle East and national  security at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, a Windy  City-based nonpartisan, independent think tank described on its  website as “committed to influencing the discourse on global  issues through contributions to opinion and policy formation,  leadership dialogue and public learning.” His “40-60 new  enemies” estimate was not scientifically drawn, but instead  relied on his intimate knowledge of Yemeni society.

Previously, Khoury was director of the Near East South Asia  Office of the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and  Research and then taught at DC’s National Defense University.

Coincidentally, that same school was the site of an address earlier this year in which Pres. Obama  insisted the US would be entering a new phase in foreign policy  with regards to its use of drones.

As was true in previous armed conflicts, this new technology  raises profound questions — about who is targeted, and why;  about civilian casualties, and the risk of creating new enemies;  about the legality of such strikes under US and international  law; about accountability and morality,” Obama said this past  May. “And yet, as our fight enters a new phase, America’s  legitimate claim of self-defense cannot be the end of the  discussion. To say a military tactic is legal, or even effective,  is not to say it is wise or moral in every instance. For the same  human progress that gives us the technology to strike half a  world away also demands the discipline to constrain that power —   or risk abusing it. “

The very precision of drone strikes and the necessary secrecy  often involved in such actions can end up shielding our  government from the public scrutiny that a troop deployment  invites. It can also lead a President and his team to view drone  strikes as a cure-all for terrorism,” added the president.   “And for this reason, I’ve insisted on strong oversight of all  lethal action. After I took office, my administration began  briefing all strikes outside of Iraq and Afghanistan to the  appropriate committees of Congress.”

Earlier this week, both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty  International called on the Obama administration to end its  overseas drone programs, blaming those assaults for dozens of  civilian deaths. Other independent studies have blamed UAVs on   hundreds of innocent casualties.

Then on Wednesday, Pakistani PM Sharif told reporters after a  meeting at the White House that he “brought up the issues of  drones” with the president, “emphasizing the need for an  end to such strikes.”

That same evening, however, the Washington Post published a  report stemming from leaked Central Intelligence Agency documents  suggesting that Pakistan’s government has been largely aware of America’s drone program  there, even assisting at times.


Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: